Browsed by
Month: May 2017

Point Break Live!

Point Break Live!

This is crazy. These guys tour around the US and live re-enact the classic 80’s Keanu Reeves’ movie “Point Break”. But even better, they come with no lead actor. They grab a few willing fans out of the audience who quickly do 3 different audition quotes, the audience votes for the best one, and that person becomes agent Johnny Utah for the next hour and a half.

It’s a pretty hilarious time – totally recommend it.

Model wooden roller coaster

Model wooden roller coaster

Model maker Adam Throgmorton shows off an incredible build – a fully functioning, massively intricate HO-scale replica of an old-school wooden rollercoaster. He reports he worked on it over the course of 6 years.

I’m also going to bet he’s not married since it seems to have its own table in the house. 🙂

Saltscapes

Saltscapes

Australian photographer Murray Fredericks journeys to the center of Lake Eyre, a desert salt lake. Fredericks drags all of his equipment out into the barren landscape, capturing the dramatic sky reflected in both the inch-deep water and his rectangular mirror. The images are breathtaking color-based works.

The failure of Coin and why gadget ventures often fail

The failure of Coin and why gadget ventures often fail

Ben Einstein does an excellent analysis of the failure of many smart gadget companies.

His analysis breaks down like this:

First generation products are always plagued with bugs, fail whales, and even the occasional mass-recall – most companies can bounce back from these setbacks. But other companies do not. It boils down to risk.

Technical Risk and Product Risk

When it comes to hardware startups, there are two types of risk. They are manageable on their own, but together often spell failure. These risks are: technical risk and product risk.

Technical risk is the chance you can’t deliver a product due to an engineering or manufacturing constraint. Examples from Coin: getting an e-Ink screen, Bluetooth antenna, battery, and microprocessor all working in a 0.76mm thick PVC card.

Product risk, however, is the risk that many overlook. Most products have low product risk. They routinely fail in small ways, but those failures are viewed as mere annoyances. A pop top that breaks off once every 1000 cans of Coke, the Roomba that occasionally misses a spot, an Alexa that mistranslates your command and you try again. Not big deals. But an automated door lock that fails might leave one stranded outside at 2am in a bad part of town or opens the door to robbers, a website that exposes your address and bank accounts for emptying, or your sole payment method that fails you at a fancy dinner are another matter.

You likely have high product risk if any of these are true:

  1. If a small number (one or two) of failures over the lifetime of your product create a negative interaction (like door locks or sole payment methods).
  2. If users would pay significantly more for a product that is guaranteed to work 100% of the time (like wireless routers).
  3. If users rely on your product for critical business operations (like point-of-sale systems).
  4. If failure could wreak massive havoc on personal security or safety (like home security systems or cars).

The Goal:

Your goal then is to only have high risk in one of the two risk classifications. Very few companies that have both kinds of risk survive. Tesla and SpaceX are notable exceptions, which should give you an idea of the efforts you will need to go to in order to overcome these risks. The other method is to reduce your feature set to minimize technical complexity or lower user expectations in case of product failure.