{"id":13095,"date":"2025-01-23T10:09:37","date_gmt":"2025-01-23T17:09:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mattfife.com\/?p=13095"},"modified":"2025-01-02T11:31:34","modified_gmt":"2025-01-02T18:31:34","slug":"long-term-oled-burnin-testing-results","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mattfife.com\/?p=13095","title":{"rendered":"Long term OLED burnin testing results"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

OLED displays are renown for their vibrant colors, popping contrast, perfectly dark blacks, wide viewing angles, and fast response times – making them great for game systems. The cons are that they are dramatically more expensive than LCD, tend to have a shorter lifespan as the organic elements degrade. Most importantly, though, like old plasma TV’s<\/a>, they are notably susceptible to burn-in. But how much burnin? <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Techspot has done a good job stress testing some popular OLED displays over the last 9 months<\/a>. They have a great breakdown with lots of analysis and pretty good testing scheme.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They also do a good job of explaining things. They note that burn-in with OLEDs is directly related to hours of usage and is cumulative. Mixing in dynamic content between periods of static content usually won’t improve the burn-in results \u2013 it’s all related to the cumulative number of hours displaying the same static content on screen. Running at a lower brightness and using dark mode will extend the lifespan because burn-in is correlated to brightness output. The safety features in most OLEDs also seems to really help.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion: they give a relatively positive update on the burn-in after 9 months of heavy static content usage (around 2,000 to 2,300 hours of total use). They report visible signs of burn-in, but the level of degradation between their\u00a06 month<\/a>\u00a0and 9 month reports have been relatively minimal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The results are that for gaming and content consumption (watching movies\/etc) – you should be fine. For those that are using it for work and lots of static work, they do note there are times you can see the burn-in on apps that have large sections of the same color. The task bar at the bottom has also shown to be problematic as are the way they arranged some side-by-side content as many do with large monitors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

But if we’re honest, we were expecting to see more burn-in after 9 months. The levels we’re seeing right now are still very tolerable, and with realistic, sensible usage, we think most people won’t run into proper burn-in problems within the first 12 to 18 months of usage on this sort of QD-OLED panel. Maybe some light burn-in here or there, a few edge cases where you’ll notice it, but nothing that ruins the experience.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

I do agree with this statement though:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Getting two good years of usage out of an OLED, though\u2026 that’s probably not going to cut it when we’re talking about high-end, $1,000 monitors.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

That said all said, OLED is probably not for me right now. If I was just play games or watching movies it might be ok, but I do too much static productivity content all day and really love the flat, large Asus ROG 38″ 4K HDR 144Hz display<\/a> I currently have (and was on a smoking sale for $499). I will probably keep the display for multiple years as I waterfall them down to other systems. The cost for a similar OLED is about $900<\/a>–$1200<\/a> right now – making it about 2x more expensive. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Links:<\/p>\n\n\n\n