Reflections – Page 17 – Matt's Homepage

2nd worse market day of 07 and mortgage bottom 9 mo away

August 9, 2007 admin Comments 0 Comment

As if it couldn’t sting more. It’s a painful article to read.

The prediction now is that the bottom of the foreclosure and mortgage woes will not be till mid-2008. AIG reports that currently 10% of all sub-prime mortgages are 60 days or more delinquent; and an estimate 20% of all sub primes will default by 2011. Overseas lenders are having to freeze and inject funds to prop up their shaky markets. Unfortunately, the pain is spreading in the markets – driving folks to bonds. Could be some very rocky markets in the next 3-4 months.

Biggest problem is if this starts badly snowballing and collapsing. The slowing/dropping prices of homes causes people to default more than just gracefully selling/bow out since they can’t just sell the property and cover their mortgages. The defaults cause houses to come back on the market. If enough of this happens, a surplus develops – which drives the prices down – making it more likely you’ll default on your ARM since you can’t sell your house at enough to cover your loan, which drives house prices down, which …wash, rinse, and repeat. Fortunately, this doesn’t seem to be getting out of control, but people are going to take a pounding – investors, owners, and mortgage companies. Question is, how much of a pounding.

Fast and loose mortgage collapses and the stories on the radio

August 8, 2007 admin Comments 0 Comment

Nationally, the sub-prime and fast-and-loose mortgage broker collapses continue to grow and spread. The tone darkened as a Bill Wheaton, an economist from MIT predicted that nationwide, several million folks will probably end up losing their homes.Overall, though, I have mixed feelings about this situation. Even in the boom, I wondered where the heck the government, investors, and brick-n-mortar banks were on watching these guys. It was absolutely ridiculous what people were pulling on these mortgage contracts – such as no income verification to speak of (put whatever you want down for your annual salary, etc). Too many people were getting into mortgages that even 10 years ago would have been laughed off the table. When I took a cursory look at some of the mortgage deals people were pushing through a few years back – I could tell these guys were used car salesmen at best. Now we hear lots of stories about people who got into a house or refinanced and were ‘tricked’ and ‘duped’ into these products. Yes, there is a lot of blame to be laid on these sleaze-ball lenders and front-men who are now slithering away to have the company take the fall for them – they definitely ruined lives when they themselves knew the products were bad for most people. Those front-line scum, and the managers that pushed it, should see jail time or at least lengthy loss of licensing for financial products. It’s also time for some

But wait a minute people – didn’t *we* do our homework? There is still a bit of blame to be placed on us as consumers for not picking up “Mortgages for Dummies” and doing the most basic, bare minimal amount of work you needed to do. Ten minutes looking at historical interest rates the last 20 years, understanding the bare minimum of how a sub-prime works, and doing some math with what your budget can take would have shown you what would happen. There’s definitely a shame-on-you that I’m sure many are now getting in very painful monthly doses right now each time their ARM goes up; or for that roof repair you didn’t plan for, or your car unexpected breaks down, etc. I don’t envy or place tons of blame on all consumers for what is happening. However, it’s time we grew up and learn that living paycheck to paycheck in NOT the way to run your life; and that proper budgeting involves much more than just thinking about what monthly payment you can afford next month – as this guy knows. I find it staggering that so many folks entered into the biggest investment of their lives and didn’t do any more homework than read a brochure they gave or just took their word for it. Just doing math to figure out your next monthly payment isn’t doing your financial homework or being a well-informed consumer – it’s a recipe for disaster. We can all read crazy amounts of stuff about the latest fad diet’s detailed food analysis, or which renewable resource our products are coming from and ban those we don’t like – but can’t spent 1 hour on the biggest outlays of cash in our lives? Did we all fail high-school economics? The question now is what do we do to ease these folks out of something they couldn’t afford in the first place; and have an orderly exit to keep the market from collapsing (which seems to be happening at a reasonable pace right now).

That’s right – and orderly exit for these folks. Not a bail-out. Not a subsidy for 20 years. People and families are going to lose houses – houses they should never have been in in the first place. Should they lose everything and end in bancruptcy – absolutely not. We have a duty to make sure it doesn’t become a whole-sale disaster. But it is time to be honest. If you cannot afford the home you bought, it’s time to get out and move into something you can afford. We as a nation should help ease that process with generous helping hands and creative helpful financing, but it’s time to live more sustainably – and I’m not just talking about paper or plastic.

As Americans, we are disgraceful financially. In China, the savings rate is about 40% – thats 40% of their take-home pay goes into savings/investment verses less than 1% rate in the US, while other industrial nations are at least in the 15% range (as were we until 10-20 years ago). In the US, almost 50% of all people don’t even have $1000 on hand for an emergency. While the average credit card debt spread over all American cardholders is more than $8000 (misleading – but true and climbing), the median balance on an American’s credit cards is still at $1900. It’s time we stopped feeling ‘entitled’ to living beyond our means with a bail-out always at our back. While I think it’s a bit overly-conservative, Dave Ramsey recommends that you buy no more home than you can pay off with: a 15 year fixed mortgage who’s monthly payment constitutes no more than 40% of your monthly take-home pay (after-taxes/15% saving), with a large enough down that you don’t need a second mortgage. Then, when you have that number, you go looking for houses in that range only. Yes, it’s smaller than you expected, but you can afford it. And afford to live a little, and afford emergencies and repairs that will always come up.

It brings up the question of always bailing someone out vs forcing personal responsibility down their throats. I’ve seen both methods fail, and have thought about this a lot recently. But more on that tomorrow….

What’s the real story anyway? Thoughts of a potential buyer

August 8, 2007 admin Comments 0 Comment

So, I started a little research into buying my first place. After doing a little number crunching, it looks like at least next year before it would be feasible. But I’m having difficulty trying to find an honest appraisal and state of Portland’s housing/condo market. It’s pretty clear that the meteoric rise of housing prices we saw the last 5-10 years has stopped. But things beyond that get very fuzzy. Previously very desirable neighborhoods seem to be seeing stagnation, new areas seem to be gentrifying fast, other areas are very hard to read, etc. Condos vs houses have conflicting anecdotal evidence. And that’s the problem – I can’t find any solid information other than what is gleaned from news stories and looking at the latest for-sale lists. Problem is, individual selling prices are all over the map – disproportionately high/low levels depending on the sellers motivation. It’s hard to get a read if a location is losing favor since people are all trying to sell at pre-slowdown prices. And that’s what I need to know as I make a minimal 5-10 year investment – will it be going up or down in the next 5-10 years? What’s the trending by location? What’s the trending by type: home vs condo?

It’s curious that local realtors’ websites are still quoting figures from the boom 2-3 years ago while updating their for sale lists every day. It kind of makes you think they know something you don’t. How come they could get those numbers in the heat of the boom, but they can’t seem to get them now? Why all the hush-hush? It makes me as a future buyer feel uncertain – and uncertainty is not a good thing when buying – makes me want to keep my money on the sidelines until patterns become clearer. The fed just announced no rate change, and inflation is ‘not a concern’. Sure, investors are pulling their money out of these high-risk, fast-and-loose mortgage places – so money is going to be tougher to get if you have tarnished credit. But if you’ve got good credit, there isn’t much to worry about. Prices are definitely not meteorically rising anymore and interest rates are likely to stay flat – so the pressure to buy isn’t there either. If I can save/invest my down payment and earn 8%, that’s roughly the same as investing in a housing market that’s growing by ~5% (for tax breaks, etc).

My concern is that I don’t want to pay a bunch of money and find out my property/area is in the middle of a decline that will probably last 3-5 years – and I just got in at the top of that drop. The few real estate agents I’ve talked with all seem overly up-beat about everything and don’t say squeak about any place’s declining values, etc. All three realtors I’ve chatted with were like: go ahead and buy now! It’s all good! And their not totally wrong, but they get more quiet when I ask where isn’t a good place to invest in.

If I were to guess, there is a lot of re-adjusting going on as the money leaves the market. And money is leaving the market as a whole; but there is no crash going on. Overall, things are probably cooling in some spots of Portland more than they thought. But where are those places? The hot and not spots of town are definitely moving around – just based on watching how much foot-traffic and cars wander through. If I had to guess, NW Portland is cooling – 23rd and 21st aren’t nearly as busy and hopping as they used to when I moved in a few years back. Alberta on the east side is going nuts with activates, new businesses, bars, fairs, etc. Hawthorn is flat to down. Condos? With lots of new buildings half-done, I suspect that unless they stagger their openings, there could be a glut. This condo developer seems to think so. But he did it too – oh – everything’s perfectly fine. I’m completely changing my business model – but there’s nothing going on at all. Yeah. I don’t think that’s the whole story.

I have been left with a bad taste in my mouth from the realtors. It almost feels like there’s this big inside secret – an elephant in the room – they won’t talk about. Because if someone does, then folks will start being told that their properties up in NW or the Pearl or Hawthorn, or wherever will -gasp- not be as good a buy as the area is slowing (or even declining) in value a bit more than other areas. And if somebody stands up to say the emperor’s clothes are off, and that certain areas are not such a good ‘buy’ – that might mean the prices for the whole area drop. And if the prices for one place drop, maybe the curtains will come down other places that are slower too. And then what will happen to our business as sellers? It’ll get tougher. What is going to happen to all those realtors that were coming out of the woodwork from real-estate school during the boom as there are less folks to sell to or a more competitive market? You’ll be shooting yourself in the foot needlessly. It’s simply not in their interest to be honest – it’s in there interest (and indirectly the seller) to get the sale. They’re long gone by the time you come around to sell again. So there is incentive from everyone in the industry to just shush, and let people wander around on their own.

This probably isn’t as dire as I’m painting it. The few figures I have found say the market is growing at the 5-7% year on year rate – pretty darn good really. But the lack of information that certainly MUST be out there and being done by these condo/housing developers isn’t getting out. It sure got out during the boom of how good things were, now, not so much – which tells you something in itself.

Corollary

July 30, 2007 admin Comments 0 Comment

I saw this quote on a forum relating to the rapid rate of scientific advancement and the corresponding demands of those advances in consumer culture.

Yesterday’s luxuries are today’s necessities.

I found that to be an interesting quote, and propose a corollary:

Yesterday’s privileges are today’s demanded rights.

I’m always intrigued by what ‘rights’ people claim to have all the time. “It’s my right to do X, it’s my right to be given Y.” I often try to find out where/how/when these purported things were granted to them as a ‘right’ – especially when those ‘rights’ imply that I should be opening my pocket to them.

In order to spell out ‘rights’ one has to have an idea of what a person is entitled to and what things are optional. We all do not have a right to own a new Mercedes free of charge, or the right to disobey the law of gravity. But we do have rights like religious freedom, due process (well, we used to until habius corpus was basically rescinded), freedom of speech/assembly and so forth (all within certain bounds of course). But I often at amazed at how quickly we forget of what sorts of things we didn’t have even a generation ago, such as the women’s right to vote amendment in 1920. It’s also too easy to just start saying we have rights that we don’t.

Determining what is someone’s right relies on a deep understanding of the value and dignity of the human person at their core – something that faith and the Church has talked about in great depth (read Humanae Vitae from the 2nd Vatican counsel for a good spelling out of what rights/dignity the human person is recognized as having. Religious freedom and choosing the option not to believe is one of them). Anyway, just thought it was an interesting quote.

Were they conservative or liberal?

July 24, 2007 admin Comments 0 Comment

While running last night, I saw an old acquaintance and we stopped to catch up. Turns out they were helping to revive the young adults program in their local parish. I mentioned there were a good number of young adult groups meeting in the Portland area and that there was probably a lot of great resources they could take advantage of.One of the events they wanted to get started was a theology on tap program. I mentioned that Portland has a very successful and large Theology on Tap discussion group/series each year. At this point, the person asked if the speakers were conservative or liberal – and that they’d much rather hear a person of affiliation X than Y.

Now, I know this particular person has a strong leaning towards one side of that affiliation, but I’m not going to say which – because it’s not important.

I think I’ve told many people that I no longer use the words conservative or liberal to describe politicians, religious philosophies, etc – because I think those words are now usually MEANT to distract from the point or idea the person wishes to share, intentionally polarizes and prejudices opinion before you even hear what the person has to say, and defuses any ability to start a dialog – and ultimately, hinders the real point and ability for both parties to lovingly grow from each other: a respectful relationship. These labels often have the primary effect of tipping the deck to rhetoric – not ideas, discussions, and mutual respect. (Yes, it is possible to have a mutually respectful relationship with someone whom you disagree with!)

Now, if you read this correctly, you’ll realize this works both ways – for so called ‘liberal’ or ‘conservative’ whatever. In this particular case when confronted with the question if the person is conservative/liberal, I simply would say, “Ah, is that the most important thing that matters to you when deciding what a person is saying?” Because if it is, you’re at best being prejudice – you a pre-judging what someone is going to say before they say it and are no longer in dialog, no longer really THINKING about the ideas, or being challenged, and don’t seem very genuinely interested in respecting the person.

It’s much easier to listen to what we want to hear – and a problem of religion (and politics) today is that we like to pick and choose what truths we’d like to hear. Unfortunately, Truth with a capital T is the reflection of how things really work. Shocking – but there is a way that things do work in the world irrespective of how we’d like to believe it works. For a religious person, this is how God intended and created them to work – and that these truths about horseshoes and blue skies and mother-in-laws are all linked as one big, beautiful mural. But by picking and choosing the things you wish to believe, you can easily start causing contradictions and conflicting messages that do not reflect the faith you profess – nor the reality that God has spun into motion. It’s much like refusing to buy into the idea of gravity because you don’t like that one. Well, it will still give you a painful reality check when you jump off a building whether you believe it or not. That is way God’s kind of truth about relationship and loving works too.

I have had to learn this difficult lesson over time: I need to not only hear the things that I would normally agree with, but I must even more constantly challenge myself to go and listen to religious folks I normally wouldn’t agree with. And you know what – God has something to say through them. It’s always very challenging, and sometimes gets me worked up. It requires a lot of internal maturity to sit, listen carefully, and then think through the ideas without just going with my first gut reaction. And again, you know what – I have grown far, far richer because of it. In all human lives and philosophies, we are always a mix of truth and the still-trying-to-get there. It is a great mistake to forget that for anyone who is truly and actively seeking God, there is always a lived experience of their faith that is on track and God is working through – and that is something to be learned from and shared. There is also a part that is not on track or still needs a lot of refining and sifting. You must listen and sift carefully with reflection and prayer – and verifying your facts with scripture and a knowledge of Church teaching.

I have come to realize that Jesus was really teaching us that we are one large family – and God has given it many parts for a reason. It’s given us scholarly folks who sit in Rome, it’s given semi-revolutionary missionaries in 3rd world countries, it’s given us the ordinary family in Kansas, it’s given us millionaires. When we start selectively listening to any one part – we are no longer challenged to grow and appreciate the need for the other parts of the family we were given – and indeed – NEED. We need all those parts – both sides – all sides – to be whole. Paul tells us the body of Christ is given many parts – and they all need to work together. If the ‘conservative’ side refuses to listen to the ‘liberal’ or vice-versa, then it is the foot ignoring the hand. We really do need all those voices together to get harmony – if not, we have a whole bunch of people singing to themselves.

Beautiful music comes from different voices – a band with 5 lead guitars isn’t as great to listen to as 5 different instruments. We might be a virtuoso at our instrument, but as any musician will tell you (me included) you actually learn how to play your own instrument differently, and arguably much better, when you start playing with other instruments. We are still a guitarist, but if we don’t learn how to play with the strengths/weaknesses of the drums and keyboardist, we won’t make even more beautiful music. So it goes in the body of Christ. Probably one of the most painful struggles in our current society is that we lack real relationality – or even the desire for it. We are now more opt to force/legislate responsibility to one another (witness rise of lawsuits for matters that normally should be resolvable by two mature adults) – but not offer real relationship in which we both give and take freely with the other’s and mutual good in mind. But I digress…

So, if we aren’t challenging ourselves to get to know and incorporate relationship with each part of the body now, if we don’t realize we really do need all the parts – the brains, the hands, and the feet of the Body of Christ, if we aren’t challenging ourselves to grow in playing our instrument (strengths/weaknesses) in concert with each others strengths/weaknesses – we will certainly continue to struggle in this life, live less rich lives ourselves, and be confronted with that need before we get to enter the kingdom.

Can you guess what it was?

July 16, 2007 admin Comments 0 Comment

Here’s a little clip of information taken directly from a recent article I was reading. I replaced the parts that would give away what it is, see if you can guess what it is:

Even as project proposals were being submitted, a 53-year-old structural engineer secretly already had the job sewn up. He had met with the government official in charge of funding and the official had rigged the process so that only this engineer could possibly win the bid. When the construction was started, more than 300 prominent [inhabitants] signed a petition protesting the [construction]. They claimed that [it] would “disfigure and dishonor” the city.

There was a great deal of protest surrounding the construction as well. A [prominent] mathematics professor predicted that when the structure passed the 748-foot mark, it would inevitable collapse; another expert predicted that the [construction]’s lightening rods would kill all the fish in the [nearby river].

The [local] edition of the New York Herald claimed the [construction] was changing the weather; and a daily newspaper ran a headline story claiming The [construction] was sinking. “If it has really begun to sink,” [local paper] pontificated, “any further building should stop and sections already built should be demolished as quickly as possible.”

What was this abominable construction that would destroy the environment and be a disfigurement to the city? It was none other than the Eiffel tower.I always try to keep things like this in mind when confronted with the scads of ‘disaster is imminent’ reports on everything from new public/religious social programs, to dams, to global warming, to whatever. Whatever you’re in the middle of, by nature you are going to be very myopic. Now, this is not to say that disastrous human endeavors do occur and are often foreseen but warnings ignored, but it reminds me that you need to look at the real data and know that expert ‘opinions’ are just that – and are just as equally wrong as right on both sides.

Instead, the only way to denounce critics or lend credibility for a plan is in a *lot* of careful research and number crunching before one begins. A great example is a task force in Portland that have done some great research on homelessness patterns and found that often times the current feed/shelter system simply prolongs and perpetuates the homeless’ problems (this is not to say that homeless help should go away – but that their influence and role needs to change in a new way). Some of their findings

There has also been all this talk of carbon-neutral obsession, bio-fuels, etc. This is all good, but simply reducing environmental impact down to your ‘carbon-load’ doesn’t take into account scads of other toxic stuff you release. Use an air conditioner in your car/home? What about your freon load? What about your arsenic load? What about your estrogen loads ? (yes, estrogens from shampoos and birth control pills goes right though water treatment and has long been known to be mutating fish/river life. That one sure doesn’t get as much press as blowing up damns now does it) Now we hear that bio-fuels aren’t that much better than other fossil fuels as far as the environment goes.

I guess my point is that productive change in the right direction requires people not being reactionary, over-simplifying the problem, or lately appealing to sentimentality or emotionalism, or even spiritualism about ‘mother earth’ (I could go on about that one being even worse than the religious appeals made in the middle-ages that everyone loves to decry) – but really put some pencils and pens to paper and do the math and science. Real science that isn’t myopic ‘experts’- or we’ll end up looking as silly as the Parisians did to future generations.

It’s Summertime, Summertime, sum-sum-summertime

June 25, 2007 admin Comments 0 Comment

Summer is here. Summer is great.

Summer is always way the heck too busy.

I find my daily social calendar gets double and triple-booked more often than a flight from Cali to New York on Christmas eve. Current events about to come up in the next 3-4 weeks: A trip to Alaska for a friend’s ordination and hiking in Denali, daily running excursions, wine parties, roller-derbies, church picnics, BBQ’s, more ordinations (3 in total!), weddings, hiking friends/groups, beach trips, movie nights, bachelor parties, journals to read, house parties, local festivals about every weekend, folks visiting from out of town, last Thursday, first Thursdays, weekly brewpub meetups with coworkers/friends, great local summer bands to go see just about every night, personal coding projects, climbing and hiking clubs I’d like to get involved with (I want to climb Hood and St. Helens), taking photographs, etc, etc, etc. I seem to turn down 4x the number of things I can make it too. It’s been wearing on me a bit. As a person that loves their quiet and down time, I usually find that by summer’s end I’m ready for a couple long months of rainy indoor activities.
Still, all this activity has brought another interesting set of questions with it. See, every year up till this one for the last 4-5 years, my summer has been figured out. I was usually doing stuff at a parish, hospital, or other seminary assignment. But now my time is all my own, and I find myself kind of floundering as to how to spend my time. I have been doing a lot of running lately to get back in shape, and as I was thinking about it a priest friend’s sermon came to mind. In one homily, he simply asked, “What will you do with this one, beautiful, wacky life you’ve been given?” It really sums up the question I’m asking myself. So. Where will it be?

We are always in relationship

January 29, 2007 admin Comments 0 Comment

I had a friend ask when it’s OK to sever a relationship – if there is a priority or hierarchy we need to follow when building our relationships and when we cut them off. They had came up with a list of ‘inviolable offenses’, and challenged others to do the same. Here was my response:

This is an interesting view. Personally, I look at this very differently. I would say we never really sacrifice relationships. Instead, whether we like it or not, we are always in relationship with each other.

I would classify relationships as an always present reality with two axes. One axis is the amount of physical interaction/contact with the person (letters/phone/in person/etc). The second axis is the interpersonal boundaries we have in that relationship – such as emotional, physical, spiritual boundaries. We modulate our relationships with others by moving back and forth on those axes, but there is always relationship. Certainly as finite beings with a finite life we cannot exercise even 1 millionth of the possible relationships we could have in this world. It does, however, mean we are in a relationship with the traffic cop, the garbage man, the people that utilize the work we do, and so forth. We might only have the most minimal ‘setting’ on both our relational axes, but it’s still there. As proof, one notes that even in the most mundane interacting with a traffic cop – which might only last half a second and there are no words spoken – we still have boundaries, shared goals, communication (verbal and nonverbal), etc. On the other end of the spectrum we are in very deep relationships with family, spouses, children, and God.

You can even have relationship if one of the axes is set completely to zero as in the case when we choose to stop physically seeing/speaking with someone. As in the case of alcoholics or others that need help, one might indeed be using the cutting of physical interaction as a communication device to help the other towards really loving (though that’s not always the real spirit its done in and this method should only be used after everything else has failed). In this way, you’re not so much ‘cutting off’ a relationship as communicating to the person your boundaries or approval/disapproval.

While this is a really cursory explanation, for me, we are all one large family in this world with relationships always ready to spring up – with one father/parent/God in heaven that we all share. I try to remind myself at each moment to look at everyone I meet as a distant relative. I certainly have a lot of estranged aunts, crazy bachelor uncles, and second-cousin’s one-hundred-times-removed. When looking at the people on the street, in shops, in cars next to me, in the pew in front, at work, or in the old folks home as family with which I’ve only begun my relationship with (and *will* be spend eternity together with a large collection of them), things become much different when looking at the world.