Kubrick wasn’t a psychotic perfectionist
Straight from the horses mouth.
Some … more fringe film critics and fans believe that Kubrick was a crazed perfectionist. They suggest entirely every move he made was some calculated, inscrutable act of a god-like master. That never set right with me. I’ve worked with top industry experts before. Yes, he was very detail oriented and went to some extreme lengths to get what he wanted (lighting in Barry Lindon for example). But all of these were with a very clear technical or emotional goal.
One thing these folks usually point to is how he made some actors do dozens and dozens of takes to get exactly the right one. Kubrick says why here as clearly as possible. It was a practical (and very British) way of handling a real problem. Maybe it’s because they didn’t study their lines in the evenings and get plenty of sleep so they were ready.
By putting the actor out there and making them do the scene again and again, it makes them think about the lines. Instead of yelling at them, he made them work the lines out on-stage in take after take in front of everyone until they do what they should have done in preparation.
It’s a subtle but very effective way of telling actors do more work on their lines. Stand there in the hot seat, repeating your scene dozens of times in front of a whole crew staring at you, and perhaps it make the actor want to come better prepared the next time so you don’t need to do 50 takes.
Kubrick worked many times with Jack Nicholson, and the story goes that when Nicholson was doing his famous ‘You can’t handle the truth’ speech for A Few Good Men, he was practicing off set leading up to the take and ended up doing the 3-4 takes almost exactly with just as much intensity each time. He was ready, and could perform on command because he did the work before getting in front of the camera. Maybe he learned that working with Kubrick.



