Browsed by
Author: matt

Rabbit R1

Rabbit R1

Co-designed by Teenage Engineering, what makes the Rabbit R1 special is the interface: instead of a grid of apps, you get an AI assistant that talks to your favorite apps and does everything for you.

You could get the R1 to research a holiday destination and book flights to it, or queue up a playlist of your favorite music, or book you a cab. In theory, you can do almost anything you can already do on your phone, just by asking. It remain a lot of questions over exactly how it works and protects your privacy in the way it describes.

Pre-orders are available at the Rabbit website with deliveries expected around March/April 2024.

Let’s hope it does better than the Humane AI pin that is already floundering and laying off staff. At least the Rabbit doesn’t require a monthly subscription.

Articles:

Another year of bad news for Oregon and Portland in 2023 and 2024

Another year of bad news for Oregon and Portland in 2023 and 2024

A while back I summarized a number of things going the wrong direction for Portland/Oregon. The problems have not stopped; and continue to get worse in many cases.

Portland and Oregon residents moving away

Business closures grow worse in 2023 and 2024

Continued drug legalization deaths and issues:

Homelessness mismanagement:

Oregon education systems failing at record-setting pace and increasingly exposed mismanagement

Masked Disruptive Protests and Attacks Haven’t Stopped

Portland got a reputation for some of the most violent and destructive riots in 2020; and it’s not that protests have stopped. They largely just changed topics – and are now increasingly attacking public leaders homes including arson attacks.

Just in the last 2 months (Nov 2023 to Jan 2024) we’ve had a list of blocked roads, bridges, and the airport

Attacks on religious buildings and members

Increasing targeted attacks on religious institutions/displays of all faith backgrounds by Antifa and other protest groups:

More spending mismanagement

EVs have 79% more reliability problems than traditional internal combustion engine cars

EVs have 79% more reliability problems than traditional internal combustion engine cars

It’s not been a rosy year for electric vehicles.

EV sales in 2024 are only 9% of vehicles sold – and seem to have reached a plateau. Automobile manufacturers such as Ford’s popular F-150 Lightning, GM, and Renault are quietly cutting production back. Even Volvo that pledged to be 100% electric by 2030 just pulled the plug on it’s efforts with Polestar. It certainly doesn’t help that average EV’s cost several thousand dollars more than gas and diesel powered vehicles.

Only 2 years after pledges to convert 25% of its fleet to electric vehicles by 2024, Hertz decided to sell 1/3 of it’s EV fleet (about 20,000 cars) in January 2024 and replace them with gas-powered vehicles – citing higher expenses related to collision and damages. By March 2024, and embattled Hertz CEO Stephen Scherr ultimately resigned over the fiasco as Hertz now focuses on a return to profitability. They’re not the only rental company quietly replacing EV’s with traditional vehicles.

Other shortcoming are starting to come out. Batteries are physical devices – devices that don’t work well in high temps of the Southwest nor in the cold winter temps of the upper states. There’s also range-anxiety, higher tire consumption and higher road wear due to the heavy weight of EV’s, higher repair costs, rising electricity prices, and now a new issue: reliability.

Now we have a few years of reliability data – and Consumer Reports says it’s not that good. The data says that EV’s have lower reliability ratings than standard gas/diesel powered vehicles. The worst reliability is for full plug-in hybrids that have 146% more issues on average.

EVs had 79 percent more reliability problems than a gasoline- or diesel-powered vehicle, on average. Plug-in hybrids fared even worse; these had 146 percent more issues on average than the conventional alternative. But simpler not-plug-in hybrids bucked this trend, with 26 percent fewer reliability problems than conventionally powered vehicles.

Consumer Reports via Ars Technica

It’s not just Consumer Reports.

Transparent LCD’s

Transparent LCD’s

LG OLED Signature T announced at CES it is going to be the first commercially available transparent TV. It definitely could add a lot to minimalist living spaces. Samsung, not to be outdone, introduced its micro-LED display technology which seems to deliver an even brighter, better image.

Transparent OLED and LCD screens have around for a while – in fact, you’re probably using one. People were making cool transparent panels by taking a standard backlit LCD, remove the LCD antiglare coating, do a little wiring, then put a lot of light behind it.

LG also has large transparent OLEG signage as well.

Personally, I don’t think just making a standard TV out of a transparent display is understanding what new things are possible with this technology. The Verge review even points out that the tv came with a movable backing screen that slid behind it to help it act more like a traditional TV – so why go transparent? I personally think this opens up a lot of new ideas for innovative new products and experiences instead of just being a minimalist TV.

To that point, the LG Dukebox showed up at CES 2024 and is one of the first devices to make use of a transparent LCD as part of the product design. It’s essentially a re-imagined jukebox. You get to see the internals of the system while the user interface is displayed on the transparent display.

While a good start, I can think of a number of interesting new products that simply COULDN’T really be made in other ways than using a transparent display. Those are the kinds of product ideas that I think are ripe for this kind of technology.

Articles:

Robotic excavator autonomously builds a stone wall

Robotic excavator autonomously builds a stone wall

HEAP (Hydraulic Excavator for an Autonomous Purpose), a modified 12-ton Menzi Muck M545, began by scanning a construction site, created a 3D map of it, then recorded the locations of boulders that had been dumped at the site. The robot then lifted each boulder off the ground and utilized machine vision technology to estimate its weight, center of gravity, and shape.

An internal algorithm then determined the best location for each boulder and built a stable, stacked/mortarless 20-ft high, 213-ft long stone wall.

Articles:

Star Trek Next Generation Mistakes

Star Trek Next Generation Mistakes

Mr. Plinkett put together one of the biggest collections of video bloopers in Star Trek TNG. From carpet shims to exposed wires to visible equipment to black paper to malfunctioning doors to countless reflections.

The emperor has no clothes

The emperor has no clothes

Sabine Hossenfelder has some very nice YouTube videos on cosmology, quantum mechanics, and other heavy science topics. This is one of the best – but it’s not about a scientific discovery. It’s about the ugly truth of science and academia. I have personally seen academic egos – and they’re just as bad, or even worse, than those in the corporate world.

People like to point to science as an ivory tower in which truth is sought above everything else – but the reality of how string theory has dominated the last 50 years of research has demonstrated the very real ugly underbelly of how science and academia really happens. It’s not just string theory – my experience is that you don’t need to look far into any major college faculty to see the same things. It’s a field of egos, iron-fisted orthodoxy of thought, and funding only for the ‘right’ kind of thinking. Step out of line, and you’ll be canceled.

String Theory dominated a lot of science for decades. Yet, problem after problem arose and every time a string theory prediction was proven wrong they either simply changed the math or said that the ‘next larger experiment’ would prove them right. String theory got more and more convoluted for almost 50 years.

The end came with the construction of the Large Hadron Collider. Thousands of scientists (such as Sabine Hossenfelder herself) wrote thousands of papers about which parts of string theory would should be proven by the Large Hadron Collider – only for LHC experiments to show none of the things string theory predicted were true. In fact, it proved to high degrees of certainty there was no evidence of supersymmetry and other predicted effects. Any of the fix-ups this time involved things like 10^500 simultaneously true models – none of which could describe proven observations made by the standard model. There were no more places to run. People that got enamored with the beautiful math of string theory found they weren’t chasing science, they were chasing science fiction.

But what makes this whole story so painful is scientists made whole careers out of string theory and destroyed the careers of those that didn’t agree. Professors and scientists could not get tenure or funding unless they were exploring string theory. Sabine herself could not bring herself to work with string theory because she believed it wasn’t true, and says she ‘threw away any chance at tenure” because of that decision.

Exploring string theory got you funded, exploring other alternatives could end your academic or scientific career. People in the video’s comments talk about how their academic and scientific careers were ended by not jumping onboard string theory. Anyone that started pointing out the increasingly glaring problems became the target of vicious personal and professional attacks. But in the end, the emperor had no clothes – as Richard Feynman originally thought.

This isn’t the first time. The Big Bang theory, first proposed in 1927 by Catholic priest and physicist Georges Lemaitre, was vilified by anti-religious sentiment in the existing scientific community that believed the universe was static. The ‘Big Bang’ theory was given as a derogatory term for the theory by pundits. Yet Lemaitre was proven right. (side note: it’s also worth noting that science and religion is NOT at odds. Straight from paragraphs 159 and 2293 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church:

It makes one think of many other fields of science that are likely going through the same kind of ram-rodding of orthodoxy today. I would guess that you’d find the worst culprits in fields/research areas that have high government funding along with a very pervasive, viciously defended, single explanatory theory for the entire field.