Browsed by
Author: matt

What do you do at an office job

What do you do at an office job

So, this response has been making the rounds on the internet and has been probably loved by the whole anti-work crowd. The video compares office work to a cult. Called the Cult of Professionalism it has the worship of a non-human deity called a company, has a cult-like doctrine in the form of mission statements/vision statements/etc, the c-suite executives are the high priestesses/priests, have buzzword filled ‘scripture’ you are expected to follow, and … well, you get the picture.

From what I can tell from her many mischaracterizations, it is likely just sarcastic satire. I don’t think she’s actually worked an office job, or probably a terribly dysfunctional one. Sadly, this is an increasingly common form of pseudo-intellectual sarcasm that disenfranchised groups like the anti-work crowd gravitate towards. It’s not new. People have done this to actual religions, government, and in recent years just about all social structures. They paint with a broad brush while at the same time offering no viable or even sound alternatives.

That’s not to say there aren’t absolutely valid points in her sarcasm. I have long been extremely worried about the growing cult-like behavior in many small startups, non-profits, and larger corporations. Places that promise that you can ‘bring your whole self to work’ are known to be toxic. It creates an environment in which your sense of self worth and self-identity is now tied to your job. Emotional manipulation is easy by leadership and it’s often a temptation they can’t avoid. (Examples: “If you’re really committed to this cause, you’ll come in to our non-paid volunteer activity on Saturday to support the work we all need to do to fight <insert your chosen ‘evil’ here>”, “We require you give us access to all your social media accounts, expect you to post all our events on all your personal accounts, and send invites to our events to everyone on your friend lists”. Both are actual things I know have happened to friends at local Portland non-profits). Finally, some organizations are requiring ever greater disclosure and adherence to ideals that have very little to do with the work being done – which is probably why we’re now seeing ever-increasing lawsuits in this area and workplace environments becoming ever more actively hostile and divisive.

At any rate, her video made the rounds on Linked-In, and I thought one user had a great response:

I feel sorry for her because she’s probably been in an environment previously or currently, that feeds her evidence of these beliefs she holds. There is a different perspective to all this hierarchy and managing. It does serve its purpose. But if you’re mentally conditioned to be a victim, it’s a great premise for oppression, by people who don’t know better, isn’t it?

It’s good satire, but feeds newbies with pre-determined beliefs and then they validate it with the one thing that did not resonate with them, and conveniently choose to ignore the other 9 instances of learning, knowledge and professionalism. Our mental conditioning sets us up for bias against even the most well meaning actions.

It has actually become really cool to label everything fascist and oppressive without owning or taking responsibility for one’s own actions or limited capabilities.

I think that last bit is really good. In the end, we can only own and control our own actions. We cannot own the actions of others and change can only begin with yourself. If there is one thing I have learned, it’s that the fastest way to get yourself into a whole host of troubles is to give into the easy temptation to start blaming others and focusing on what others are doing wrong instead of focusing 100% on myself and my actions. Secondly, we must recognize we have limited capabilities. Even the most ardent startup leaders say working together and with others is critical to getting anything done – no matter what people want to believe. We simply cannot do things by ourselves – we must work together. And when we must work together, structure develops. No matter how much people have tried to deny that in the past – to horrific consequences.

I think a vast untapped area of need is the growing disenfranchised population of young people that now mistake meme-like anti-intellectual sarcasm for real wisdom – while ignoring being educated on the countless decades of empirical research and well understood social and behavioral data. Sadly, we seem to be slipping into the same mistakes we made in the early 20th century – mistakes that cost millions of lives and lead to the most oppressive political regimes in all of human history.

Libby stinks, I want my Overdrive

Libby stinks, I want my Overdrive

Overdive Media pulled their app for PC Windows 10/11 in February 23, 2022. Unfortunately, their new app, Libby, doesn’t allow you to actually download and listen to the mp3’s on your Windows desktop.

I seemed to have 2 copies of the app and they do seem to still work as of Dec 2022.

Download links:

ODMediaConsoleSetup.msi version 3.6.0 – Copyright 2016 Overdrive, Inc.

ODMediaConsoleSetup.msi version 3.2.0 from software.informer

Links:

John Carmack quits Meta and its VR efforts

John Carmack quits Meta and its VR efforts

John Carmack has quit Meta and their Meta VR efforts. I think that this is a perfect example of how visionary people get sucked in and are often ill equipped to the workings of large corporate machinations. The very things that make big corporations hugely successful (ability to work at scale, massive market share, highly disciplined and tracked execution) can ultimately be the reason they struggle with prototype development, innovation, or innovative people.

Some clues are in some of the interesting things Carmack says,

Carmack complained that it has been a “struggle” for him to influence Meta’s overall direction and that he’s “wearied of the fight.” Despite his high-ranking “consulting CTO / executive advisor” title, Carmack complained that he is “evidently not persuasive enough” to change Meta’s VR efforts for the better.

“We have a ridiculous amount of people and resources, but we constantly self-sabotage and squander effort. There is no way to sugar coat this,” he wrote. “I think our organization is operating at half the effectiveness that would make me happy.”

There he talked about his internal efforts to push for the development of a “super cheap, super lightweight” Meta VR headset that could come in at “$250 and 250 grams.” Instead, Meta has put its recent VR hardware efforts behind the heavily overdesigned and $1,500 Quest Pro. In his October keynote Carmack told Meta that “the basic usability of Quest really does need to get better” and that “our app startup times are slow, our transitions are glitchy… We need to make it a whole lot better… much, much faster to get into.”

I think Carmack is a skunkworks technical leader. He’s used to working with a small team of extremely talented engineers on rapid development of extraordinary projects. Skunkworks and vision projects like this get crushed when you try to scale too quickly to dozens of interconnected teams. Instead, one must develop the solid core of the idea and prove it 100% – then scale to production. If you try to scale without 100% coherent vision and the issues sorted out, you’ll end up bleeding money, vision, and worst of all: time and energy switching direction. I think that’s why he feels exhausted and only sees people being 50% effective.

It’s the common case of agility vs scale. Big organizations with skilled but compartmentalized development teams often fail slowly after wasting tons of people’s time. Not because they are bad teams, but because they are often given delivery goals and usually do not have the power to switch direction on their own or often see the bigger picture to ensure the solution works properly across groups. This costs a lot in money, management time, and possibly reworks. Instead of one person failing, approaching the lead with alternatives and then re-thinking the approach at a higher level, the team continues to try to meet the goal without the ability to see the bigger picture or make better wholistic changes.

Anyway – the article is a fascinating read.

blindfold duck catching

blindfold duck catching

Catching a duck is a very entertaining folk game in the festive life of Hanoi people. If you go to festivals in Hanoi in the days after the Lunar New Year, you will probably have the opportunity to participate in this game. https://hanoidiscover.com/

Reminds me of our local county fair chicken drop contest.

Mike Schmidt is quite possibly the next Chesa Boudin

Mike Schmidt is quite possibly the next Chesa Boudin

Mike Schmidt is the current Portland DA. He, much like San Francisco DA Chesa Boudin, was elected on a platform of justice reform policies to reduce incarceration, bail, and alternatives to prosecution and sentencing. However, he was heavily criticized for mismanagement of the office, dramatic increases in crime, and insensitivity to victims (especially sexual assault victims his office dismissed). Ultimately voters chose to remove him from office by a recall.

So how has Schmidt done? Not so well. In fact, almost identically as bad.

First off, his office has been decimated with 13 lawyers leaving during the first nine months of 2022 when he took over. Most damning are seven of whom were women who wrote extremely pointed letters:

Just like other cities that banked heavily on reform candidates, Portland has experienced dramatic upticks in crime. Portland is no different; but is dramatically worse than national averages. Almost all crimes have doubled in just 2 years. Particularly bad is the fact murders, disproportionately of people of color, have doubled until Portland’s per-capita murder rate is higher than Boston or San Francisco. The increased deaths of minorities in 2020 and 2021 now outstrips those killed by police in total over the last decade each year with 2022 shaping up to be even worse.

Reform apologists try to explain this as simply the result of the pandemic, but most other countries have seen a decrease in crime during covid. The answer is not simple and there are probably multiple factors. Still, one has to wonder when your city increases at double the rate of the national averages.

That might be excusable except he has had almost no success on any of his reform efforts. Combine that with such disasters from his leadership like this, and there is solid reason for Schmidt to be concerned:

Articles:

Looney Tunes Backgrounds

Looney Tunes Backgrounds

Early cartoon animators at Warner Brothers of the 50’s were considered part of the golden age of American animation. As it turns out, the animators were often pretty astounding, well versed, well trained, and groundbreaking artists in their own right. They often make references to many famous and popular styles of art.

The Looney Tunes Background Instagram account has a fantastic collection of these backgrounds. I find browsing the minimalist backgrounds from the cartoons reminds me a lot of one of my favorite painters Edward Hopper. And there’s a good reason for that.

The Gaze digs into these backgrounds and does a fantastic job covering the art and artists that inspired these liminal/minimalists backgrounds such as: Edward Hopper, De Chirico, Rockwell Kent, Salvador Dali, and David Hockney.

He points out the fantastic set of design rules developed by Maurice Noble. Noble started at Disney which focused on realism. They even used rotoscoping to get movement as perfect as possible. Noble went the opposite direction when he left and joined Warner Brothers. He created a new set of design rules where the background art becomes part of the distorted and comical setup for each scene. He’s probably most famous for What’s Opera Doc? in which Elmer Fudd hunts Bugs Bunny in an lampooned opera. Hawley Pratt, Robert Gribbroek, Paul Julian, Richard Thomas and many others contributed to these fantastic artistic developments at Warner Brothers as well.

Give this video a look to see more.

AI based digital re-aging

AI based digital re-aging

Disney published this paper about using AI to digitally age and de-age actors in a fraction of the time it usually takes for normal frame-by-frame manual aging techniques used today.

FRAN (which stands for face re-aging network) is a neural network that was trained using a large database containing pairs of randomly generated synthetic faces at varying ages, which bypasses the need to otherwise find thousands of images of real people at different (documented) ages that depict the same facial expression, pose, lighting, and background. Using synthetically generated training data is a method that’s been utilized for things like training self-driving cars to handle situations that aren’t easily reproducible.

The age changes are then added/merge onto the face. It appears this approach fixes a lot of the issues common in this kind of approach: facial identity loss, poor resolution, and unstable results across subsequent video frames. It does have some issues with greying hair and aging very young actors, but produces results better than techniques used just a few years ago (not that the bar was very hard to beat).

Links: